deepsense.ai vs Addepto: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
deepsense.ai (3.9/5) edges ahead of Addepto (3.8/5) overall. deepsense.ai is the better choice for technical teams wanting AI strategy from model builders. Addepto is the stronger option for manufacturers wanting a small first AI engagement. The right choice depends on the size of your program, your budget, and whether you want the same firm to build what it recommends.
deepsense.ai vs Addepto: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | deepsense.ai | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| HQ | Warsaw, Poland | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 120+ | 50–249 |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Strategy workshops run by engineers who build vision and language models | Low Clutch entry point ($10,000+) for AI roadmap work in data-heavy industries |
| Pricing model | $100–$149/hr (Clutch band); project-based | $50–$99/hr (Clutch band); project-based |
| Min. engagement | $25,000+ (Clutch) | $10,000+ (Clutch) |
| Primary tech stack | Python, PyTorch, AWS | Databricks, Azure, AWS |
| Industries served | Retail, Manufacturing, Financial services, Healthcare, Media | Manufacturing, Aviation, Logistics, Retail, Financial services |
deepsense.ai vs Addepto: overview
deepsense.ai
deepsense.ai was founded in 2014 in Warsaw and has an office in Palo Alto, with about 120 AI specialists, several of them Kaggle competition winners (per company website; independently unverifiable). It sells AI strategy consulting and workshops, though most of its work is engineering: computer vision, language models, and predictive systems. Clutch lists rates of $100–$149 an hour and a $25,000+ minimum project. That puts it at the top end for a Central European firm.
Addepto
Addepto was founded in Warsaw in 2017 and was acquired in December 2025 by KMS Technology, an Atlanta digital engineering company backed by Sunstone Partners. Its chief executive says 97% of the team are AI engineers (per company website; independently unverifiable). It sells AI consulting and roadmaps for data-heavy industries such as manufacturing and aviation, followed by builds. Clutch lists $50–$99 an hour and a $10,000+ minimum project, so a small first engagement is possible.
Services and capabilities: deepsense.ai vs Addepto
| Capability | deepsense.ai | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Readiness assessment | ✗ | ✓ |
| Use-case prioritization | ✓ | ✗ |
| TCO / ROI modeling | ✗ | ✗ |
| AI governance & EU AI Act | ✗ | ✗ |
| Build vs. buy advice | ✗ | ✗ |
| Audit of live AI programs | ✗ | ✗ |
| Change management | ✗ | ✗ |
| Can build what it recommends | ✓ | ✓ |
Frameworks and platforms: deepsense.ai vs Addepto
| Framework / platform | deepsense.ai | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | N/A | N/A |
| GDPR | N/A | N/A |
| NIST AI RMF | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| Google Cloud | ✓ | N/A |
| Databricks | N/A | ✓ |
| Snowflake | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: deepsense.ai vs Addepto
| Criterion | deepsense.ai | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $25,000+ (Clutch) | $10,000+ (Clutch) |
| Engagement models | Strategy & roadmap engagement, Delivery team | Readiness assessment, Strategy & roadmap engagement, Delivery team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: deepsense.ai vs Addepto
| Dimension | deepsense.ai | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Retail, Manufacturing, Financial services | Manufacturing, Aviation, Logistics |
| Best use cases | Workshops to pick a first computer vision or language model project., Technical feasibility reviews for an AI product idea. | A small readiness check and roadmap for a manufacturer., Predictive maintenance and quality models in industrial settings. |
| Typical project type | Strategy & roadmap engagement | Readiness assessment |
deepsense.ai vs Addepto: pros and cons
| deepsense.ai | |
|---|---|
| + | Workshops are run by people who build models, so feasibility advice is concrete |
| + | Strong research background in computer vision and language models |
| + | Offers AI training for client teams |
| + | Published Clutch rates make budgeting easier |
| - | Strategy is a small part of an engineering-led business |
| - | Higher Clutch rate band than most Polish peers |
| - | No change-management practice |
| Addepto | |
|---|---|
| + | A $10,000+ Clutch minimum allows a small first step |
| + | Team is almost entirely engineers, so roadmaps stay technically grounded |
| + | Experience with manufacturing and aviation data |
| + | Databricks experience for data platform work |
| - | Acquired by KMS Technology in December 2025, and integration may change teams and priorities |
| - | Strategy work is mostly a front end to engineering |
| - | Little governance or change-management work |
Who should choose deepsense.ai?
A typical fit: workshops to pick a first computer vision or language model project.
Strategy workshops run by engineers who build vision and language models. Minimum engagement starts at $25,000+ (Clutch). Works best with clients in Retail, Manufacturing, Financial services, Healthcare, Media.
Who should choose Addepto?
A typical fit: a small readiness check and roadmap for a manufacturer.
Low Clutch entry point ($10,000+) for AI roadmap work in data-heavy industries. Minimum engagement starts at $10,000+ (Clutch). Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Aviation, Logistics, Retail, Financial services.
Decision matrix: deepsense.ai vs Addepto
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| Your board wants a costed, sequenced roadmap within a quarter | Neither lists cost modeling; ask for a sample roadmap |
| You already run AI that is missing its targets | Neither offers a separate audit; ask for a scoped review |
| Regulators will ask how each AI system is governed | Neither lists governance work; add a specialist |
| AI will change roles and processes for many staff | Neither; plan change management separately |
| You want the strategy firm to build the result too | Both can deliver after the strategy |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Addepto |
| You need a large team across many countries | deepsense.ai |
Use case fit: deepsense.ai vs Addepto
| Use case | deepsense.ai fit | Addepto fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workshops to pick a first computer vision or language model project. | Strong | Limited | deepsense.ai |
| Technical feasibility reviews for an AI product idea. | Strong | Limited | deepsense.ai |
| A small readiness check and roadmap for a manufacturer. | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
| Predictive maintenance and quality models in industrial settings. | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
Verdict: deepsense.ai vs Addepto
deepsense.ai (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Strategy Consulting projects. Strategy workshops run by engineers who build vision and language models.
Addepto (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need predictive maintenance and quality models in industrial settings. If your situation matches that, Addepto is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
deepsense.ai vs Addepto FAQ
Is deepsense.ai better than Addepto?
deepsense.ai (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. deepsense.ai's strongest advantage: workshops are run by people who build models, so feasibility advice is concrete. Addepto's strongest advantage: a $10,000+ Clutch minimum allows a small first step.
How do deepsense.ai and Addepto differ in pricing?
deepsense.ai's pricing: $100–$149/hr (Clutch band); project-based with a minimum engagement of $25,000+ (Clutch). Addepto's pricing: $50–$99/hr (Clutch band); project-based with a minimum engagement of $10,000+ (Clutch). Any hourly bands shown come from Clutch, not a published rate card, so a scoping call is still needed for a project quote.
Which is better for enterprise: deepsense.ai or Addepto?
deepsense.ai is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultant before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between deepsense.ai and Addepto?
deepsense.ai's primary differentiator is: strategy workshops run by engineers who build vision and language models. Addepto's primary differentiator is: low Clutch entry point ($10,000+) for AI roadmap work in data-heavy industries. They also differ in team size (120+ vs 50–249), minimum engagement ($25,000+ (Clutch) vs $10,000+ (Clutch)), and primary industries served (Retail, Manufacturing vs Manufacturing, Aviation).
Verify all details directly with each consultant before making a decision.