Top AI Strategy Consultants

Ekimetrics vs Centric Consulting: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Ekimetrics (4.0/5) edges ahead of Centric Consulting (4.0/5) overall. Ekimetrics is the better choice for marketing-led companies tying AI to measurable returns. Centric Consulting is the stronger option for US mid-size firms wanting governed, practical AI adoption. The right choice depends on the size of your program, your budget, and whether you want the same firm to build what it recommends.

Ekimetrics vs Centric Consulting: head-to-head summary

Criterion Ekimetrics Centric Consulting
Founded 2006 1999
HQ Paris, France Dayton, USA
Team size 400+ 1,400
Rating 4.0 / 5 4.0 / 5
Primary differentiator AI strategy anchored in marketing measurement and sustainability metrics Practical AI adoption with acceptable-use policies and centers of excellence for mid-size firms
Pricing model Project fees; rates not published Consulting fees per engagement; rates not published
Min. engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Primary tech stack Google Cloud, Azure, Python Azure, Microsoft Copilot, AWS
Industries served Retail, Consumer goods, Luxury, Automotive, Financial services, Healthcare Insurance, Healthcare, Financial services, Manufacturing, Retail

Ekimetrics vs Centric Consulting: overview

Ekimetrics

Ekimetrics was founded in Paris in 2006 and has 400+ data scientists and consultants across Paris, London, New York, Hong Kong, and other offices. Best known for marketing-mix measurement, it has added AI strategy and sustainability analytics, and in February 2026 it bought Actable, a customer analytics software company. Strategy engagements start from outcomes you can measure, such as marketing return or emissions. The scope is narrower than a general AI roadmap but much easier to tie to a budget line.

Centric Consulting

Centric Consulting was founded in 1999 with a remote workforce and is headquartered in Dayton, Ohio, with about 1,400 employees in the US and India. Its AI practice writes acceptable-use policies for generative AI tools, sets up AI centers of excellence, and builds custom solutions, with ready-made accelerators for insurance and healthcare. Expect practical adoption help for mid-size firms more than grand strategy.

Services and capabilities: Ekimetrics vs Centric Consulting

Capability Ekimetrics Centric Consulting
Readiness assessment ✗ ✓
Use-case prioritization ✓ ✗
TCO / ROI modeling ✓ ✗
AI governance & EU AI Act ✗ ✓
Build vs. buy advice ✗ ✗
Audit of live AI programs ✗ ✗
Change management ✗ ✓
Can build what it recommends ✓ ✓

Frameworks and platforms: Ekimetrics vs Centric Consulting

Framework / platform Ekimetrics Centric Consulting
EU AI Act N/A N/A
GDPR N/A N/A
NIST AI RMF N/A N/A
AWS N/A ✓
Azure ✓ ✓
Google Cloud ✓ N/A
Databricks ✓ N/A
Snowflake N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Ekimetrics vs Centric Consulting

Criterion Ekimetrics Centric Consulting
Minimum engagement Not disclosed Not disclosed
Engagement models Strategy & roadmap engagement, Delivery team, Ongoing advisory Strategy & roadmap engagement, Readiness assessment, Delivery team
Rate transparency Not public Not public
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: Ekimetrics vs Centric Consulting

Dimension Ekimetrics Centric Consulting
Best company size Startup to mid-market Mid-market to enterprise
Best industries Retail, Consumer goods, Luxury Insurance, Healthcare, Financial services
Best use cases Measuring and reallocating marketing spend with AI models., Sustainability reporting and emissions analytics. Writing a generative AI acceptable-use policy and rolling out Copilot safely., Setting up an AI center of excellence in an insurer.
Typical project type Strategy & roadmap engagement Strategy & roadmap engagement

Ekimetrics vs Centric Consulting: pros and cons

Ekimetrics
+ Ties each AI use case to a number finance already tracks
+ Marketing-mix and customer analytics experience going back to 2006
+ Sustainability and emissions analytics are rare among AI strategy firms
+ Delivers the models as well as the plan
- Narrower than a general AI strategy firm, centered on marketing and sustainability
- The Actable acquisition (February 2026) is still being integrated
- Little change-management practice
Centric Consulting
+ Acceptable-use policies and AI centers of excellence are standard deliverables
+ Industry accelerators for insurance and healthcare shorten the first project
+ Change management and staff training sit inside the same engagement
+ Priced and staffed for mid-size US companies
- Limited reach outside the US and India
- Less suited to research-heavy or novel model work
- Rates and minimums are not published

Who should choose Ekimetrics?

A typical fit: measuring and reallocating marketing spend with AI models.

AI strategy anchored in marketing measurement and sustainability metrics. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Consumer goods, Luxury, Automotive, Financial services, Healthcare.

Who should choose Centric Consulting?

A typical fit: writing a generative AI acceptable-use policy and rolling out Copilot safely.

Practical AI adoption with acceptable-use policies and centers of excellence for mid-size firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Insurance, Healthcare, Financial services, Manufacturing, Retail.

Decision matrix: Ekimetrics vs Centric Consulting

Your situation Recommended choice
Your board wants a costed, sequenced roadmap within a quarter Ekimetrics
You already run AI that is missing its targets Neither offers a separate audit; ask for a scoped review
Regulators will ask how each AI system is governed Centric Consulting
AI will change roles and processes for many staff Centric Consulting
You want the strategy firm to build the result too Both can deliver after the strategy
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Ekimetrics (Not disclosed) vs Centric Consulting (Not disclosed)
You need a large team across many countries Centric Consulting

Use case fit: Ekimetrics vs Centric Consulting

Use case Ekimetrics fit Centric Consulting fit Winner
Measuring and reallocating marketing spend with AI models. Strong Limited Ekimetrics
Sustainability reporting and emissions analytics. Strong Limited Ekimetrics
Writing a generative AI acceptable-use policy and rolling out Copilot safely. Limited Strong Centric Consulting
Setting up an AI center of excellence in an insurer. Limited Strong Centric Consulting

Verdict: Ekimetrics vs Centric Consulting

Ekimetrics (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Strategy Consulting projects. AI strategy anchored in marketing measurement and sustainability metrics.

Centric Consulting (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need setting up an AI center of excellence in an insurer. If your situation matches that, Centric Consulting is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Ekimetrics vs Centric Consulting FAQ

Is Ekimetrics better than Centric Consulting?

Ekimetrics (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Ekimetrics's strongest advantage: ties each AI use case to a number finance already tracks. Centric Consulting's strongest advantage: acceptable-use policies and AI centers of excellence are standard deliverables.

How do Ekimetrics and Centric Consulting differ in pricing?

Ekimetrics's pricing: project fees; rates not published. Centric Consulting's pricing: consulting fees per engagement; rates not published. Any hourly bands shown come from Clutch, not a published rate card, so a scoping call is still needed for a project quote.

Which is better for enterprise: Ekimetrics or Centric Consulting?

Centric Consulting is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultant before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Ekimetrics and Centric Consulting?

Ekimetrics's primary differentiator is: AI strategy anchored in marketing measurement and sustainability metrics. Centric Consulting's primary differentiator is: practical AI adoption with acceptable-use policies and centers of excellence for mid-size firms. They also differ in team size (400+ vs 1,400), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Retail, Consumer goods vs Insurance, Healthcare).

Verify all details directly with each consultant before making a decision.